{"id":7694,"date":"2026-07-02T00:31:07","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T05:31:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/?p=7694"},"modified":"2026-07-02T07:14:56","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T12:14:56","slug":"affective-determinants-of-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/volume05-issue01\/affective-determinants-of-health.html","title":{"rendered":"Affective Determinants of Health (ADoH): A Conceptual, Evidentiary, and Mechanistic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Brian K. Sullivan, PsyD<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Persistent negative feelings such as stress, loneliness, fatigue, pain, irritability, anxiety, malaise and depression are more than temporary discomforts. When they endure, even at subclinical levels, they predict disease, disability, and premature mortality as strongly as many traditional medical and social risks. Yet decades of evidence have not yet been organized into a framework that recognizes these states as determinants of health in their own right. This article advances the concept of Affective Determinants of Health (ADoHs), a category parallel to Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). For such purposes, I define affectivity as the systemic capacity to feel, affects as its phenomenal instances, and affective determinants as the subset of affects that meet criteria for determinant status.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A novel contribution of this framework is the recognition that persistent affects function not only as indicators of strain, suffering, and distress, but as stressors themselves, producing cumulative biological and psychosocial strain. To explain their operation, I introduce a Three-Channel Model of biological, behavioral, and coping pathways and describe the construct of cumulative affective load<\/em>, which parallels allostatic load. By consolidating diverse evidence, I argue that systematic recognition of ADoHs as transdiagnostic determinants can improve early detection, prevention, and intervention across clinical care, population health, workplaces, education, and policy. Recognizing ADoHs highlights both the costs of neglect and the opportunity to address the affective foundations of health, equity, and human functioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/em><\/strong>affective determinants of health, affectivity, social determinants of health (SDOH)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Public Significance Statement<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Persistent feelings such as stress, loneliness, fatigue, pain, irritability, anxiety, malaise\/illness and depression are not just symptoms of illness or discomforts of daily life. When they last over time, even below diagnostic thresholds, they increase the risk of serious health problems, disability, and early death. This article proposes that these states be recognized as Affective Determinants of Health (ADoHs), in parallel with how social determinants like income, education, and neighborhood conditions are now acknowledged. Framing them as determinants clarifies their predictive power, mechanisms of action, and modifiability. It also highlights opportunities for intervention across healthcare, workplaces, schools, and communities. Naming and addressing ADoHs makes visible an insufficiently consolidated and operationalized domain of health risk and prevention, with potential to reduce suffering, improve equity, and strengthen the foundations of public health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Affectivity has been the subject of extensive theoretical proposals and empirical research. Drawing from core affect models (Russell, 1980), constructivist perspectives (Barrett, 2017), embodied accounts (Damasio & Damasio, 2023), component process theories (Scherer, 2009), enactive and phenomenological approaches (Maiese, 2023; Colombetti, 2014), as well as control-process models (Carver & Scheier, 1990) and predictive frameworks such as Affective Inference Theory (Velasco & Loev, 2021), this paper integrates these insights into a unified definitional framework and argues that certain affective experiences (affects) constitute risk factors independent of their status as symptoms of disorders or diseases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The idea that affective states can act as determinants of health and functioning is not without precedent. Dolezal and Lyons (2017) argued that health-related shame operates as an affective determinant, showing how it influences healthcare access, adherence, and wellbeing in ways that parallel social determinants. Similarly, Affective Determinants of Health Behavior<\/em> (Williams, Rhodes, & Conner, 2018) highlighted how affective attitudes, anticipated emotional responses, and related constructs influence health behaviors. These contributions foreshadow the present thesis but focus either on a single affect or on health-related behaviors. My framework extends this groundwork by identifying a broader class of affects that rise to determinant status and by situating them within a comprehensive definitional and<\/p>\n\n\n\n

mechanistic model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clinical and diagnostic thresholds for many candidate affective experiences have been well characterized epidemiologically, with clinical depression affecting 13.1% of U.S. adults in a given 2-week period and representing a 60% increase over the past decade (Brody & Hughes, 2025), generalized anxiety disorder affecting 6.6% annually with broader anxiety symptoms in 19-20% of American adults (Terlizzi & Villarroel, 2020), and the U.S. Surgeon General declaring loneliness a public health epidemic affecting an estimated 37-40% of Americans (Gallup, Inc., 2024), while chronic pain affects 20.9% of U.S. adults overall and 21.7% of women specifically (Rikard et al., 2023). However, far less is known about the population burden, distribution, and determinant-level significance of these affects across sub-clinical and sub-syndromal levels. Similarly, while social determinants of health have been extensively mapped across diverse populations the extent to which affective determinants show distinctive prevalence profiles, persistence patterns, and health impacts across age, gender, racial\/ethnic, and socioeconomic groups or other social determinants of health (SDOH) variables remains largely uncharacterized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This gap is particularly consequential because evidence presented below suggests that determinant-level effects may operate across a broad range of affective intensity, not confined to clinical thresholds. Clarifying these questions\u2014how affective determinants manifest, persist, and accumulate across populations at sub-clinical levels, and how they are distributed across demographic groups\u2014represents a critical frontier for population health science (Brody & Hughes, 2025; Rikard et al., 2023; Terlizzi & Villarroel, 2020; Gallup, Inc., 2024; World Health Organization, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The eight affects emphasized here\u2014stress, anxiety, depressed mood, irritability, loneliness, fatigue, pain, and malaise\u2014are among the most common complaints in primary care, behavioral health, and population surveys (Kroenke & Mangelsdorff, 1989; Kessler et al., 2003, 2005; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015; Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007; Ferrari et al., 2013; WHO, 2017; Servaes, Verhagen, & Bleijenberg, 2002; Von Korff et al., 1992; Stringaris & Goodman, 2009; Vidal-Ribas et al., 2016; Kumari, Head, & Marmot, 2004). Their prevalence, persistence, and well-documented associations with morbidity, mortality, and functional costs make them especially strong candidates for determinant status. Persistent loneliness predicts cardiovascular disease at magnitudes comparable to traditional medical risk factors (Steptoe et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2025); depressed mood ranks among leading global contributors to disability (Ferrari et al., 2013); chronic stress dysregulates immune and metabolic systems (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007); fatigue predicts substantial work disability (van Amelsvoort et al., 2002); chronic pain associates with increased mortality risk (Webb et al., 2024); and poor self-reported emotional well-being predicts mortality independent of objective health status (Cohen et al., 2015; Lorem et al., 2020). These health consequences are neither equally distributed nor inevitable, as elaborated below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consequently, my aim is fourfold: to define affectivity as the systemic capacity to feel; to delineate affects as its phenomenal instances; to specify criteria for identifying which affects qualify as ADoHs based on epidemiological and mechanistic significance; and to introduce a three-channel model explaining their operation through biological\/allostatic, behavioral, and coping-related pathways. In doing so, I introduce the concept of cumulative affective load<\/em>, which<\/p>\n\n\n\n

parallels the concept of allostatic load. By providing this conceptual language, I aim not to displace prior work but to consolidate it. Just as the field of SDOH unified diverse contextual factors under a single framework, ADoHs can consolidate diverse affective experiences under a framework that is simultaneously phenomenological, mechanistic, and population-relevant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Special Focus: Historical Lineage of Affectivity<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

From Aristotle’s reflections on passions to William James’s embodied psychology and beyond, affectivity has long been regarded as central to human life (Aristotle, trans. 1991; James, 1884). Early modern philosophers debated its role in reason and action; Descartes (1649\/1989) framing passions as mechanistic processes of mind\u2014body interaction, and Spinoza (1677\/1996) presenting affects as essential to conatus<\/em>, the striving for persistence. Though sidelined during the rise of behaviorism and cognitive science (Hilgard, 1980), psychology re-engaged affectivity with systematic accounts such as Frijda’s (1986) laws of emotion. Modern perspectives further reasserted its importance: control-process theories link affect to goal pursuit (Carver & Scheier, 1990), evolutionary psychiatry emphasizes adaptive functions (Nesse, 2019), and stress physiology and neuroscience confirm health relevance (McEwen, 2017; Damasio, 2010). Selye’s (1956\/1976) formulation of stress as biological strain, and McEwen’s (1998, 2017) elaboration into allostatic load, demonstrated that chronic affect-laden strain can be biologically toxic. This lineage contextualizes the recognition of affective determinants of health today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[END SPECIAL FOCUS]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defining Affectivity<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Affectivity<\/em> can be defined as a whole-body (albeit predominantly neural) system of processes that generates a felt sense of what matters, in what ways, and to what degrees, based on interoceptive, somatosensory, exteroceptive, mnemonic, cognitive, and imaginal inputs<\/p>\n\n\n\n

processed concurrently, though not always equally (Craig, 2002; Damasio & Damasio, 2023; Simmons et al., 2013; Barrett & Bliss-Moreau, 2009; Barrett & Satpute, 2013; Schacter et al., 2008). Affective phenomena thus include both the systemic processes and the conscious, valenced experiences that emerge from them (Barrett & Bliss-Moreau, 2009; LeDoux & Hofmann, 2018; Russell, 1980). This system initiates, directs, modifies, and ceases attention and motivated behavior with varying phenomenal intensity and temporal persistence (LeDoux & Hofmann, 2018; Wrzus & Luong, 2016; Yap et al., 2017). Its essence lies in the felt orientation of the organism to its internal milieu and environment (Russell, 1980; Posner, Russell, & Peterson, 2005; Zych & Gogolla, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the purposes of this framework, affects are the phenomenal instances of affectivity. This usage encompasses emotions, moods, and other transient or persistent feeling-states, while avoiding contested distinctions (e.g., Barrett, 2016; Lindquist et al., 2012; Adolphs, 2016) and I do not seek here to resolve any such debates. By foregrounding their shared property—conscious, valenced experience that orients attention and behavior—I provide a transdiagnostic vocabulary useful for clinical, public health, and policy applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Characteristics of Affects<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Affects share several principal characteristics. They are subjectively experienced, constituting the phenomenal “what-it-feels-like” dimension of mental life (Nagel, 1974; LeDoux & Brown, 2017). They are temporally flexible, occurring in anticipation, during encounters, or retrospectively as relief or regret (Nesse, 1990; Dolan, Dayan, & Daw, 2022). All involve phenomenal valence, experienced as positive, negative, or mixed (Russell, 1980; Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson, 1999). They vary in intensity, which is phenomenally distinct from arousal (Ventura-Bort, Wendt, & Weymar, 2021), though arousal is a frequent concomitant (Barrett & Bliss-Moreau, 2009; Russell, 1980).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Affects bias action tendencies and shape behavior. Control-process theory conceptualizes affect as feedback about goal progress (Carver & Scheier, 1990, 1998), while Affective Inference Theory situates affect within predictive processing, proposing that feelings are inferences about action viability and expected outcomes (Velasco & Loev, 2021). Both perspectives converge on affect’s role as action-guiding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Affects also exert cognitive and physiological consequences, influencing decision-making, memory, and stress regulation (Clore & Huntsinger, 2007; Dolcos et al., 2017; McEwen, 2017). Expression—facial, postural, or vocal—may occur but is neither necessary nor reliable (Anderson & Guerrero, 1996; Zych & Gogolla, 2021). They can be linguistically labeled with varying granularity across individuals and cultures, influencing regulation (Lindquist & Barrett, 2008). Finally, affects can be categorized as discrete families (Ekman, 1992; Roseman, 2011) or<\/p>\n\n\n\n

located within dimensional spaces of valence and arousal (Russell, 1980; Posner et al., 2005; Loev, 2022). Affects may be continually experienced although not necessarily at the foreground of attentional awareness at any given moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am mindful of the homunculus fallacy<\/em>; my claim is not that affects “do” things as if they were little actors, but that they are embodied processes and lived dynamics (Dennett, 1991; Colombetti, 2014). They are instantiated in physiological regulation and simultaneously<\/p>\n\n\n\n

experienced as the felt sense of tension, vitality, or burden through which those processes are lived (Damasio, 2010). This experiential dimension is constitutive, not additive: the feeling is the way physiological regulation becomes consciously meaningful. Thus, to say that “affects exert effects” is shorthand for distributed processes that are mechanistic and experiential at once, emerging from and contributing to the functioning of bodily and psychological systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Some Affects Become Enduring<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Some affects become persistent because the same mechanisms that make them adaptive—orienting organisms to restore safety, connection, or equilibrium—can also trap them. Neural plasticity sensitizes circuits to repeated activation (Baliki, Geha, Apkarian, & Chialvo, 2008).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Slow-acting mediators like cortisol and cytokines sustain tone across hours and days (McEwen, 2017). Biased attention and appraisal loops reinforce vigilance: loneliness heightens social threat sensitivity (Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009), irritability strengthens hostile attribution bias (Stringaris & Goodman, 2009). Some background affects are dispositional, reflecting temperament or neurobiological set-points (Kagan & Snidman, 2004; Rothbart, Ahadi, & Evans, 2000). Others are acquired through trauma, recalibrating systems toward persistence (Heim,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Newport, Mletzko, Miller, & Nemeroff, 2008; Teicher & Samson, 2016). Gene–environment interactions amplify vulnerability (Caspi et al., 2003). Evolutionary pressures favor persistence over premature disengagement (Nesse, 2019). When corrective signals are absent, affects remain sensitized, transforming adaptive signals into enduring phenomena that qualify as determinants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some affects are truly persistent, continuing as a background tone even without constant awareness. Core affective states may manifest as enduring mood (Russell, 2003), action tendencies can outlast episodes (Frijda, 1986), and neural processes shape behavior outside awareness (LeDoux & Brown, 2017). Philosophical accounts likewise highlight background affectivity as constitutive of meaning and motivation (Maiese, 2023). Others are effectively<\/em> persistent: episodic states frequent or severe enough that, upon reflection, individuals report them as characteristic of their existence. Instruments such as the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 capture this retrospective recognition (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & L\u00f6we, 2006). For example, a person may deny continuous anxious affect yet endorse moderate anxiety on a two-week lookback because episodes recur often.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research confirms that such retrospective recognition corresponds to genuine persistence: loneliness endures by heightening attentional bias toward social threat cues (Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009), irritability shows temporal stability and predicts long-term impairment even when episodic (Stringaris & Goodman, 2009), and chronic pain involves network reorganization that sustains its burden (Baliki, Geha, Apkarian, & Chialvo, 2008; Apkarian, Hashmi, & Baliki, 2009). Subsyndromal depression exemplifies effective persistence, with recurrent low mood predicting impairment even absent continuous presence (Judd et al., Subsyndromal depressive symptoms illustrate effective persistence: even when depressive symptoms are not continuously present, recurrent subthreshold symptoms predict functional impairment and adverse long-term course (Judd et al., 1994; Judd et al., 1998). These states are clinically meaningful because they remain amenable to intervention, including psychotherapy for subthreshold depression (Cuijpers et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The mechanisms that sustain persistence—neural sensitization, slow-acting mediators, biased appraisal loops, dispositional set-points, trauma recalibrations, and evolutionary pressures—explain how certain affects become recurrent or chronic. At the same time, these persistent affects can also be understood phenomenologically as evaluative stances<\/em>: embodied orientations through which the world is disclosed in value-laden terms. From this perspective, stress reveals the world as over-demanding, anxiety as uncertain and potentially threatening, depression as emptied of possibility, irritability as filled with provocations, loneliness as socially barren, pain as injurious, fatigue as energetically unaffordable, and malaise as inhospitable or unwell. This phenomenological construal is consistent with enactivist and existential accounts of affectivity (Maiese, 2023; Ratcliffe, 2008; Colombetti, 2014). Such stances not only emerge from mechanistic processes but also reinforce them, because they reorganize meaning, bias attention, and shape behavior in ways that sustain their own conditions. Framing persistence in this dual manner—mechanistic and phenomenological— suggests they both arise from<\/em> and become<\/em> feedback loops that recalibrate health trajectories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From Affects to Determinants<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Although all affects belong to the broad system of affectivity, only a subset functions as determinants of health. Fleeting feelings and occasional transient moods can produce acute physiological changes, but evidence suggests they rarely accumulate into long-term morbidity or mortality risk unless they recur frequently or consolidate into persistent states (Segerstrom & Miller, 2004; Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007; Pressman & Cohen, 2005). Persistent or recurrent affects can assume a determinant-level role in shaping population outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The criteria for determinant status parallel those of social determinants of health: epidemiological significance, mechanistic plausibility, and modifiability (Marmot & Wilkinson, 2006; WHO, 2008; Braveman, Egerter, & Williams, 2011). Evidence from transdiagnostic interventions such as Barlow and colleagues’ Unified Protocol shows that persistent affective states can be modified by targeting shared mechanisms of emotion regulation, avoidance, and maladaptive coping, further underscoring their determinant status (Farchione et al., 2012; Barlow et al., 2017). Determinant-level affects consistently predict disability, morbidity, and premature mortality. By definition, their influence is transdiagnostic<\/em>, cutting across multiple disorders, diseases, and outcomes. They manifest across diverse outcomes; and they are modifiable by psychosocial, medical, peer, community, digital, and other interventions (e.g., Lattie, Cohen, Winquist, & Mohr, 2019; Masi, Chen, Hawkley, & Cacioppo, 2011; Pfeiffer, Heisler, Piette, Rogers, & Valenstein, 2011; Shekelle et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several exemplars illustrate this class. Chronic loneliness predicts cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality at magnitudes comparable to other risks (Holt-Lunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015). Persistently depressed mood ranks among the leading global contributors to disability (Ferrari et al., 2013; WHO, 2017). Chronic stress is implicated in immune, metabolic, and cardiovascular dysregulation (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007). Fatigue, illness-related or not, forecasts outcomes beyond diagnostic boundaries (Servaes, Verhagen, & Bleijenberg, 2002). Irritability predicts suicide risk, aggression, and occupational impairment (Stringaris & Goodman, 2009; Vidal-Ribas, Brotman, Valdivieso, Leibenluft, & Stringaris, 2016). Anxiety predicts depression, substance misuse, and medical morbidity (Craske et al., 2017). Malaise, often dismissed as nonspecific, refers to a diffuse, subjective sense of diminished wellness or vitality, encompassing feelings of being unwell, weak, or sick. Like the construct of “poor subjective health” used in epidemiology, malaise captures a broad felt state that may arise independently or in the context of medical or psychiatric conditions. Its presence, whether syndromal or subclinical, predicts functional decline, absenteeism, and cardiometabolic risk (Kumari, Head, & Marmot, 2004).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Importantly, determinant status extends to sub-clinical but enduring levels across all major exemplars. Non-syndromal fatigue and malaise predict absenteeism and cardiometabolic risk (Kumari, Head, & Marmot, 2004; Servaes, Verhagen, & Bleijenberg, 2002). Low-to-moderate but persistent loneliness and anxiety contribute to cardiovascular risk and functional decline (Holt-Lunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Craske et al., 2017). Sub-threshold depressed mood forecasts disability and increased service utilization even outside major depressive episodes (Judd, Paulus, Wells, & Rapaport, 1996). Chronic stress at modest levels predicts dysregulated immune and metabolic function (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007). Persistent irritability, even when not syndromal, is associated with heightened risk of suicidality and long-term impairment (Stringaris & Goodman, 2009). Likewise, recurrent pain of moderate intensity, including musculoskeletal pain, predicts functional decline and disability (Von Korff, Ormel, Keefe, & Dworkin, 1992). Taken together, these findings underscore that it is persistence and recurrence—rather than severity alone—that confer determinant-level significance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Three-Channel Model<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Predictive validity identifies which affects qualify as determinants, but explanatory frameworks clarify how they exert effects. A Three-Channel Model organizes evidence across biological, behavioral, and coping domains, highlighting points of intervention and hypotheses about cumulative burden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Biological\/Allostatic Channel<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Persistent affects disrupt physiological regulation in ways paralleling allostatic load (McEwen, 1998, 2017). Stress, anxiety, and pain dysregulate the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, immune signaling, and cardiovascular tone (Segerstrom & Miller, 2004; Institute of Medicine, 2011). Loneliness alters immune gene expression, including pro-inflammatory profiles (Cole et al., 2011). Depression and fatigue are likewise linked to systemic inflammatory changes and metabolic dysregulation, while irritability and malaise often co-occur with heightened physiological reactivity, sustaining low-grade toxic strain. From the perspective of Affective Inference Theory, repeated inferences of insufficiency or threat keep physiological systems on chronic alert, producing cumulative biological effects. Persistent affects disrupt physiological regulation in ways paralleling allostatic load (McEwen, 1998, 2017). In this sense, they do not merely signal the presence of stress but act as stressors themselves, sustaining biological strain<\/p>\n\n\n\n

through chronic activation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Behavioral\/Psychosocial Channel<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Because affects are motivational, persistent negative states bias action in maladaptive directions. Stress, depression, and fatigue reduce activity, disrupt sleep, and erode adherence to healthy routines (Katon, 2011; Tice, Bratslavsky, & Baumeister, 2001). Anxiety increases vigilance and avoidance, limiting opportunity and functioning (Craske et al., 2017). Loneliness and irritability foster withdrawal and conflict, degrading support networks (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015; Zohar, 1999). Pain contributes to physical inactivity and social disengagement, while malaise amplifies absenteeism and diminished role functioning. Across these affects, treatment non-adherence emerges as a critical pathway: depression, stress, and related burdens reliably predict lower adherence to medical regimens and preventive behaviors (DiMatteo, Lepper, & Croghan, 2000; Grenard et al., 2011). In this way, everyday behaviors become distorted, sustaining and magnifying health risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coping\/Regulatory Channel<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Coping strategies motivated by a desire to avoid, diminish the intensity of, or reduce the duration of unpleasant affects often provide short-term relief but can impose long-term harm. Substance use, compulsive eating, and reliance on sedatives or stimulants exemplify maladaptive relief (Cooper, Frone, Russell, & Mudar, 1995). Poor nutrition, sedentarism, and compulsive distraction (Meier & Reinecke, 2020; Roberts, Yaya, & Manolis, 2014), as well as rumination, suppression, or rigid avoidance (Gross & John, 2003; Nolen-Hoeksema, Wisco, & Lyubomirsky, 2008), entrench cycles of burden. These patterns cut across conditions: fatigue may invite overreliance on stimulants, pain may prompt opioid use, stress and anxiety may drive compulsive distraction, depression and malaise foster withdrawal and avoidance as attempts to downregulate distress through behavioral disengagement, while irritability escalates maladaptive confrontation\u2014a behavioral outlet for affective intensity that momentarily relieves accumulating tension. Thus, the coping channel shows how various determinants perpetuate risk through regulation strategies that can backfire.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although analytically distinct, the three channels are mutually reinforcing. Biological dysregulation increases vulnerability to maladaptive behavior; behavioral shifts amplify coping demands; and maladaptive coping worsens physiological strain and functioning. These feedback loops can magnify risk and prolong the persistence of a given affect or collections thereof. For example, loneliness may prompt excessive alcohol use and social media consumption, which disrupt sleep, thereby heightening irritability and alienating behaviors, further sustaining the lonely state. In this way, interactions across channels can entrench a single determinant over time. In practice they are causally entangled, linked by bidirectional feedback and effects. Hypotheses and interventions would anticipate cross-channel spillover.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Special Focus: <\/strong>Cumulative Affective Load<\/em><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Like allostatic load in biology (McEwen & Stellar, 1993; Seeman, Singer, Rowe, Horwitz, & McEwen, 1997; McEwen, 1998; McEwen & Gianaros, 2010), cumulative affective load<\/em> captures the lived burden of multiple affects—stress, fatigue, loneliness, irritability, pain—occurring<\/p>\n\n\n\n

together. In this framework, each persistent affect represents a stressor itself, with cumulative risk arising from their interaction. Distinct affects retain unique pathways yet interact synergistically, creating toxic combinations. Importantly, cumulative affective load<\/em> can be assessed through self-report and behavioral measures, offering a clinically accessible complement to biomarker-based allostatic load (Kumari, Head, & Marmot, 2004; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015; Stringaris & Goodman, 2009).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whereas allostatic load emphasizes cumulative physiological strain, cumulative affective load<\/em> highlights the subjective and behavioral dimensions through which strain is lived. It is not proposed as a replacement but as a complementary construct, extending the explanatory reach of allostatic load by incorporating the affective burdens that erode resilience and accelerate decline. I propose that cumulative affective load<\/em> may forecast the emergence of allostatic load and operate concurrent with it, as sustained affective pressures and biological dysregulation tend to develop in parallel and reinforce one another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[END SPECIAL FOCUS}<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Integration<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

The framework can be understood as a progressive sharpening of focus: affectivity as the systemic capacity for felt prioritization; affects as the phenomenal instances of this system; affective determinants of health as the subset that rise to determinant status; and the Three-Channel Model as the explanatory mechanism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Notably, in lived experience, determinants rarely occur in isolation, and distinct ADoHs frequently exacerbate one another across the same channels. Stress, anxiety, depression, irritability, fatigue, loneliness, pain, and malaise often co-occur and interact (Kessler et al., 2005; Kroenke et al., 2010). Chronic pain interacts with depression and fatigue (Bair et al., 2003; Finan, Goodin, & Smith, 2013). Loneliness amplifies depressive symptoms and anxiety (Cacioppo et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2018). Irritability contributes to conflict, reinforcing isolation and stress (Pickles et al., 2010; Stringaris & Goodman, 2009).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cumulative affective load<\/em> helps explain these dynamics. Allostatic load describes accumulating physiological strain from repeated stress; cumulative affective load<\/em> describes the accumulating burden of interacting affective determinants. Distinct appraisal profiles (Roseman, 2011) suggest that loneliness, fatigue, and irritability each contribute unique risks even when co-occurring. The framework therefore emphasizes both the distinctiveness of each determinant and their<\/p>\n\n\n\n

potential to combine into a cumulative burden with wide-ranging effects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Context and Broader Influences<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Affective determinants of health do not emerge in isolation from broader social, developmental, and structural conditions. Social determinants, adverse childhood experiences, trauma, and inequities—including racial and economic disparities—shape the onset, intensity, and expression of affective states. Adverse childhood experiences are linked to chronic stress, depression, and pain syndromes later in life (Felitti et al., 1998; Hughes et al., 2017). Experiences of discrimination and inequity increase anxiety, irritability, and physiological stress dysregulation (Williams, Lawrence, & Davis, 2019). Social gradients in health influence exposure to negative affective states (Marmot, 2005). While trauma and structural adversity strongly amplify risk, research also shows that persistent affective determinants can arise from the accumulation of everyday stressors. Daily diary and epidemiological studies demonstrate that chronic minor hassles—work strain, interpersonal conflict, caregiving burdens—predict sustained negative affect, dysregulated physiology, and long-term health decline (Almeida, 2005; Bolger, DeLongis, Kessler, & Schilling, 1989; Zohar, 1999; McEwen, 1998).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ADoHs therefore not only mediate and moderate the effects of broader conditions but also generate and perpetuate them. Persistent depression, fatigue, and pain reduce productivity and shorten work-life expectancy, contributing to economic insecurity (Kessler et al., 2006; Pedersen et al., 2019; Von Korff et al., 1992). In parents, depressive and irritable states diminish caregiving quality and increase conflict, thereby creating adverse home environments that become exposures for children (Heim et al., 2008; Teicher & Samson, 2016). Depressive symptoms in adolescence forecast lower educational attainment, seeding later socioeconomic disadvantage (Judd et al., 1996). Loneliness and irritability can destabilize social ties, leading to erosion of protective networks (Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009). In this way, affective<\/p>\n\n\n\n

determinants act as stressors that shape the very structural and developmental risks often treated as upstream. Clarifying these bidirectional dynamics is essential for explanatory accuracy and policy relevance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Implications<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Population Health<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Acknowledging affective states as determinants allows them to be measured and monitored alongside smoking, hypertension, and social disadvantage—not only as correlates of stress, but as stress exposures in their own right. Incorporating ADoHs into large-scale surveys and surveillance systems would clarify their contributions to morbidity, mortality, disability, and health-span. Routine inclusion of measures for stress, loneliness, fatigue, and related affects would enable better risk stratification, helping to identify high-burden subgroups before clinical conditions manifest. Population-level tracking would also illuminate interactions with other determinants, such as how economic insecurity amplifies fatigue or how social isolation accelerates pain-related disability, providing a fuller picture of cumulative risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Despite their prevalence, ADoHs remain undermeasured. Depression and anxiety screening has gained traction (USPSTF, 2016, 2023; Siu et al., 2016; O’Connor, Rossom, Henninger, Groom, & Burda, 2016), but stress, fatigue, pain, irritability, loneliness, and malaise are seldom assessed in standardized form (Kumari et al., 2004; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015; Institute of Medicine, 2011; Stringaris & Goodman, 2009). Key gaps include identifying which affects, in what combinations and durations, best predict outcomes. Closing these gaps requires longitudinal designs, EHR integration (Taylor, 2006), and linkage with biological and social data (McEwen, 2017; Williams et al., 2019). Advanced methods such as machine learning, network modeling, and digital phenotyping can detect nonlinear dose–response and interaction effects (Bzdok & Meyer-Lindenberg, 2018; Insel, 2017; Robinaugh et al., 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clinical Care<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In clinical settings, ADoHs can be integrated into routine workflows with minimal burden. Brief self-report or digital assessments of stress, fatigue, pain, loneliness, irritability, and depressed mood provide actionable data for early detection and stepped care (Donovan & Blazer, 2020; Katon, 2011). Incorporating these measures into annual wellness visits, chronic disease management, remote monitoring, and behavioral health encounters expands the set of modifiable risks clinicians can address. Embedding ADoH metrics in electronic health records not only enhances prognostic accuracy (Taylor, 2006) but also allows longitudinal monitoring and proactive outreach when thresholds are exceeded. Evidence from digital and peer-supported interventions shows that even low-intensity strategies, applied early, reduce burden (Lattie et al.,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2019; Pfeiffer et al., 2011). Recognition of ADoHs therefore equips clinicians to move beyond reactive treatment toward anticipatory prevention and transdiagnostic care. However, equitable clinical implementation requires assessment tools and protocols designed and validated for diverse populations. Given current gaps in understanding how affective determinants manifest across age, gender, and racial\/ethnic groups, clinicians must employ culturally responsive assessment approaches and remain attentive to potential disparities in how affective burden is recognized and addressed in different populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Workplaces and Education<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Affective determinants influence performance, safety, and development across the lifespan. In workplaces, stress, fatigue, and irritability contribute to absenteeism, presenteeism, turnover, and error rates, all of which carry substantial productivity and cost implications (OECD, 2015; WHO, 2020). Organizations that address psychological safety and reduce affective burden not only mitigate risk but also foster engagement and resilience (Kivim\u00e4ki & Steptoe, 2018). In education, fatigue, anxiety, loneliness, and irritability undermine attention, learning, and social development. Conceptualizing these states as determinants underscores the importance of early screening, supportive environments, and resilience-building interventions in schools (WHO, 2020). Addressing ADoHs in work and educational contexts therefore functions as both a performance strategy and a long-term public health investment. However, affective burden is not equally distributed across populations. As noted in population health and research contexts, social determinants shape who experiences persistent affective states most intensely. Organizations committed to equity must therefore design interventions that explicitly address disparities in affective burden by demographic group, drawing on emerging evidence while remaining attentive to the distinctive profiles and needs of marginalized populations within their settings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Policy<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Just as codification of social determinants reshaped global health priorities, recognition of affective determinants could guide investment, reimbursement, and regulation. Insurance coverage and payment models could incentivize ADoH screening and early intervention; community health planning could incorporate local affective risk profiles; and workplace standards could address fatigue, stress, and psychological safety as systematically as physical hazards (WHO, 2013; Institute of Medicine, 2013). International bodies that embraced SDOH as a framework for equity could similarly adopt ADoHs, strengthening policy coherence across health, education, and labor sectors (Marmot, Allen, Boyce, Goldblatt, & Morrison, 2020). At the policy level, recognition of affective determinants repositions them not as soft or ancillary concerns but as foundational drivers of health and equity, warranting coordinated, cross-sector action. Moreover, at the policy level, infrastructure supporting research into affective determinant disparities across populations is critical. Just as policy investments enabled systematic study of SDOH disparities, comparable support for examining how affective determinants manifest and compound across age, gender, racial\/ethnic, and socioeconomic groups would accelerate knowledge development and guide evidence-based, equitable interventions across all sectors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

The evidence for recognizing a class of affective phenomena that operate as transdiagnostic risk factors<\/em> for disease, disability, and premature mortality is compelling. To label these states as Affective Determinants of Health (ADoHs) is not a mere rebranding, but a necessary consolidation that highlights their collective importance alongside social, behavioral, and biological risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The significance of this recognition lies in its practical implications. Early detection and ongoing monitoring of ADoHs, paired with effective prevention and intervention strategies, can reduce suffering, lower costs, improve equity, and save lives. Determinant status does not hinge on diagnostic severity; sub-clinical but enduring forms of stress, loneliness, fatigue, irritability, pain, depressed mood, and malaise are epidemiologically consequential, making their recognition essential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While this article has focused on persistent negative affects that operate as risks, the broader field of ADoH could also encompass positive and protective affects. Experiences such as hope, gratitude, social connectedness, and vitality are likewise enduring states that predict resilience, recovery, and long-term health (Fredrickson, 2001; Cohn et al., 2009; Pressman & Cohen, 2005; Stellar et al., 2015). Their omission here reflects the need to first establish the determinant status of burdensome affects, which have historically been overlooked despite robust evidence of risk. Yet the same framework that demonstrates how stress, loneliness, and fatigue undermine health can also explain how protective affects foster adaptation and flourishing. Future work may therefore extend ADoH beyond risk to include promotive factors, ensuring a balanced science of affective determinants that addresses both vulnerability and resilience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether a formal field of ADoH research and practice should be consolidated remains an open question, subject to institutional priorities and disciplinary boundaries. Nevertheless, the time has come to recognize the affective determinants of health reviewed here, and potentially others as research may reveal, as central to the challenges and opportunities of modern healthcare and policy. Systematic recognition and integration of ADoHs into research, clinical care, public health, workplaces, education, and policy not only promises to transform individual outcomes and collective wellbeing, but also to advance equity, reduce costs, and reshape how health systems confront the affective foundations of human functioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Special Focus: Costs of Persistent Subclinical Affects<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Persistent affects exert measurable health and economic costs even at low-to-moderate, subclinical levels. Key studies demonstrate this across all eight exemplars:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Stress.<\/em> Modest chronic stress predicted immune dysregulation and cardiovascular morbidity, with downstream health costs (Cohen, Janicki-Deverts, & Miller, 2007).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Loneliness.<\/em> Meta-analytic evidence shows persistent loneliness increases premature mortality risk on par with smoking and obesity (Holt-Lunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Fatigue.<\/em> Non-syndromal fatigue in cancer survivors predicted absenteeism and reduced role functioning beyond diagnostic categories (Servaes, Verhagen, & Bleijenberg, 2002).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Pain.<\/em> Recurrent moderate musculoskeletal pain forecasted functional decline and work disability, not only severe pain syndromes (Von Korff, Ormel, Keefe, & Dworkin, 1992).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Irritability.<\/em> Subthreshold irritability in youth predicted long-term social and occupational impairment (Stringaris & Goodman, 2009).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Anxiety.<\/em> Subclinical anxiety increased risk for depression, substance use, and medical morbidity, with added healthcare burden (Craske et al., 2017).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Depressed mood.<\/em> Persistent but subsyndromal depressive symptoms forecasted disability and greater service utilization (Judd, Paulus, Wells, & Rapaport, 1996).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Malaise.<\/em> Moderate malaise scores predicted cardiometabolic risk and absenteeism in the Whitehall II study (Kumari, Head, & Marmot, 2004).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Together, these findings establish a critical principle: Determinant status depends not on diagnostic severity but on demonstrable harm. Even subclinical levels of persistent stress, loneliness, fatigue, pain, irritability, anxiety, depressed mood, and malaise exact real costs\u2014in disability, functional decline, healthcare burden, and lost economic productivity. These costs warrant recognition as determinants, meriting systematic monitoring, preventive intervention and policy development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[END SPECIAL FOCUS]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Adolphs, R. (2016). How should neuroscience study emotions? By distinguishing emotion states, concepts, and experiences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12<\/em>(1), 24\u201331. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/scan\/nsw153><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Almeida, D. M. (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14<\/em>(2), 64\u201368. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anderson, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1996). Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. In P. A. Anderson & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts<\/em> (pp. 49\u201396). Academic Press. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-012057770-5\/50004-8><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apkarian, A. V., Hashmi, J. A., & Baliki, M. N. (2009). Pain and the brain: Specificity and plasticity of the brain in clinical chronic pain. Pain, 152<\/em>(3 Suppl), S49\u2013S64. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pain.2009.02.015<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aristotle. (1991). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation<\/em> (J. Barnes, Ed.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published ca. 4th century BCE)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bair, M. J., Robinson, R. L., Katon, W., & Kroenke, K. (2003). Depression and pain comorbidity: A literature review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163<\/em>(20), 2433\u20132445. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.163.20.2433><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Baliki, M. N., Geha, P. Y., Apkarian, A. V., & Chialvo, D. R. (2008). Beyond feeling: Chronic pain hurts the brain, disrupting the default-mode network dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience, 28<\/em>(6), 1398\u20131403. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1523\/JNEUROSCI.4123-07.2008><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Sauer-Zavala, S., Murray-Latin, H., Ellard, K. K., Bullis, J. R., Bentley, K. H., Boettcher, H. T., & Cassiello-Robbins, C. (2017). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Therapist guide<\/em> (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/med:psych\/9780190686014.001.0001><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Barrett, L. F. (2016). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12<\/em>(1), 1\u201323. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/scan\/nsw154><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain<\/em>. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Barrett, L. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2009). Affect as a psychological primitive. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41<\/em>, 167\u2013218. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0065-2601(08)00404-8><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2013). Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: Towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23<\/em>(3), 361\u2013372. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.conb.2012.12.012><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57<\/em>(5), 808\u2013818. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.57.5.808><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011). The social determinants of health: Coming of age. Annual Review of Public Health, 32<\/em>, 381\u2013398. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brody, D. J., & Hughes, J. P. (2025). Depression prevalence in adolescents and adults: United States, August 2021\u2013August 2023. NCHS Data Brief, 527, 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15620\/cdc\/174579<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bzdok, D., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2018). Machine learning for precision psychiatry: Opportunities and challenges. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3<\/em>(3), 223\u2013230. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpsc.2017.11.007><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cabanac, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 173<\/em>(4002), 1103\u20131107. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.173.4002.1103><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115<\/em>(3), 401\u2013423. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.115.3.401><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13<\/em>(10), 447\u2013454. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2009.06.005><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76<\/em>(5), 839\u2013855. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.76.5.839><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2010). Perceived social isolation makes me sad: Five-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychology and Aging, 25<\/em>(2), 453\u2013463. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0017216><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97<\/em>(1), 19\u201335. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.97.1.19><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior<\/em>. Cambridge University Press. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139174794><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., McClay, J., Mill, J., Martin, J., Braithwaite, A., & Poulton, R. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301<\/em>(5631), 386\u2013389. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1083968><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11<\/em>(9), 393\u2013399. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2007.08.005><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. JAMA, 298<\/em>(14), 1685\u20131687. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.298.14.1685><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9<\/em>(3), 361\u2013368. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0015952><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108<\/em>(7), 3080\u20133085. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1014218108><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind<\/em>. MIT Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cooper, M. L., Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Mudar, P. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69<\/em>(5), 990\u20131005. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.69.5.990><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3<\/em>(8), 655\u2013666. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nrn894><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Craske, M. G., Stein, M. B., Eley, T. C., Milad, M. R., Holmes, A., Rapee, R. M., & Wittchen, H.-U. (2017). Anxiety disorders. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3<\/em>(1), 17024. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nrdp.2017.24><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain<\/em>. Pantheon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Damasio, A., & Damasio, H. (2023). Feeling & knowing: Making minds conscious<\/em>. Pantheon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained<\/em>. Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0316180665<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Descartes, R. (1989). The passions of the soul<\/em> (S. Voss, Trans.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DiMatteo, M. R., Lepper, H. S., & Croghan, T. W. (2000). Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: Meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160<\/em>(14), 2101\u20132107. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.160.14.2101><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dolan, R. J., Dayan, P., & Daw, N. D. (2022). Neurobiology of affective inference: From prediction error to motivated behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23<\/em>(9), 537\u2013550. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41583-022-00635-3><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dolcos, F., Katsumi, Y., Moore, M., Berggren, N., de Gelder, B., Derakshan, N., Koster, E. H. W., Ladouceur, C. D., Okon-Singer, H., Pegna, A. J., Schweizer, S., Vanlessen, N., & Dolan, R. J. (2017). Neural correlates of emotion\u2013attention interactions: From perception, learning, and memory to individual differences and training interventions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 76<\/em>(B), 646\u2013666. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2016.12.008><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dolezal, L., & Lyons, A. (2017). Health-related shame: An affective determinant of health. Medical Humanities, 43<\/em>(4), 257\u2013263. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medhum-2017-011206><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Donovan, N. J., & Blazer, D. (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Review and commentary of a National Academies report. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28<\/em>(12), 1233\u20131244. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jagp.2020.08.005><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6<\/em>(3\u20134), 169\u2013200. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02699939208411068><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K. K., Boisseau, C. L., Thompson-Hollands, J., Carl, J. R., Gallagher, M. W., & Barlow, D. H. (2012). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 43<\/em>(3), 666\u2013678. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.beth.2012.01.001><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14<\/em>(4), 245\u2013258. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0749-3797(98)00017-8><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Freedman, G., Murray, C. J. L., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013). Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS Medicine, 10<\/em>(11), e1001547. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001547><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finan, P. H., Goodin, B. R., & Smith, M. T. (2013). The association of sleep and pain: An update and a path forward. Journal of Pain, 14<\/em>(12), 1539\u20131552. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpain.2013.08.007><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56<\/em>(3), 218\u2013226. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066X.56.3.218><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions<\/em>. Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gallup, Inc. (2024, August-September). Daily loneliness afflicts one in five in U.S. Retrieved from https:\/\/news.gallup.com\/poll\/651881\/daily-loneliness-afflicts-one-five.aspx<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Grenard, J. L., Munjas, B. A., Adams, J. L., Suttorp, M., Maglione, M., McGlynn, E. A., & Gellad, W. F. (2011). Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: A meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26<\/em>(10), 1175\u20131182. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-011-1704-y><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85<\/em>(2), 348\u2013362. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.85.2.348><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Han, L., Wang, G., Xu, W., Wang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2022). Effectiveness of psychotherapy for subthreshold depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 52<\/em>(13), 2436\u20132447. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0033291720004940><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heim, C., Newport, D. J., Mletzko, T., Miller, A. H., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2008). The link between childhood trauma and depression: Insights from HPA axis studies in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33<\/em>(6), 693\u2013710. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psyneuen.2008.03.008><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16<\/em>(2), 107\u2013117. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1520-6696(198004)16:2>\\<107::AID-JHBS2300160202\\>3.0.CO;2-Y<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10<\/em>(2), 227\u2013247. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691614568352><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., Jones, L., & Dunne, M. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2<\/em>(8), e356\u2013e366. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2468-2667(17)30118-4><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Insel, T. R. (2017). Digital phenotyping: Technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA, 318<\/em>(13), 1215\u20131216. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2017.11295><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Institute of Medicine. (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research<\/em>. National Academies Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Institute of Medicine. (2013). U.S. health in international perspective: Shorter lives, poorer health<\/em>. National Academies Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9<\/em>(34), 188\u2013205. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/os-IX.34.188><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judd, L. L., Paulus, M. P., Wells, K. B., & Rapaport, M. H. (1996). Sociodemographic and clinical features of subsyndromal depressive symptoms and depressive disorder in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45<\/em>(1\u20132), 123\u2013133. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0165-0327(96)00059-3><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (2004). The long shadow of temperament<\/em>. Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Katon, W. J. (2011). Epidemiology and treatment of depression in patients with chronic medical illness. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 13<\/em>(1), 7\u201323. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31887\/DCNS.2011.13.1\/wkaton><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., Rush, A. J., Walters, E. E., & Wang, P. S. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Journal of the American Medical Association, 289<\/em>(23), 3095\u20133105. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.289.23.3095><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62<\/em>(6), 593\u2013602. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archpsyc.62.6.593><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62<\/em>(6), 617\u2013627. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archpsyc.62.6.617><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kessler, R. C., Heeringa, S., Lakoma, M. D., Petukhova, M., Rupp, A. E., Schoenbaum, M., Wang, P. S., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Ustun, T. B. (2006). Individual and societal effects of mental disorders on earnings in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163<\/em>(9), 1561\u20131568. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1176\/ajp.2006.163.9.1561> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kivim\u00e4ki, M., & Steptoe, A. (2018). Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 15<\/em>(4), 215\u2013229. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nrcardio.2017.189><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kroenke, K., & Mangelsdorff, A. D. (1989). Common symptoms in ambulatory care: Incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. American Journal of Medicine, 86<\/em>(3), 262\u2013266. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9343(89)90293-3><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16<\/em>(9), 606\u2013613. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & L\u00f6we, B. (2010). The Patient Health Questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: A systematic review. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32<\/em>(4), 345\u2013359. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kumari, M., Head, J., & Marmot, M. (2004). Prospective study of social and other risk factors for incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Whitehall II study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164<\/em>(17), 1873\u20131880. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.164.17.1873><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81<\/em>(4), 684\u2013696. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.81.4.684><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lattie, E. G., Cohen, K. A., Winquist, N., & Mohr, D. C. (2019). Digital mental health interventions in clinical care settings: An evidence review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21<\/em>(7), e12869. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/12869> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

LeDoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017). A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114<\/em>(10), E2016\u2013E2025. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1619316114><\/p>\n\n\n\n

LeDoux, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). The subjective experience of emotion: A fearful view. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19<\/em>, 67\u201372. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cobeha.2017.09.009><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lindquist, K. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2008). Constructing emotion: The experience of fear as a conceptual act. Psychological Science, 19<\/em>(9), 898\u2013903. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2008.02174.x><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35<\/em>(3), 121\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0140525X11000446<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Loev, A. (2022). Epistemic feelings are affective experiences. Emotion Review, 14<\/em>(1), 3\u201315. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17540739221104464><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maiese, M. (2014). How can emotions be both cognitive and bodily? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13<\/em>(2), 275\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11097-014-9373-z<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maiese, M. (2023). ‘Semantic dualism’ and the role of the body in emotional experience. Journal of Philosophy of Emotion, 5<\/em>(1), 11\u201317. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33497\/2023.summer.2><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Malinauskas, R., Malinauskiene, V., Dumarkaite, A., & Malinauskas, M. (2022). Online psychological interventions to reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and general distress in those with chronic health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 52<\/em>(6), 1054\u20131070. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0033291720003261><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365<\/em>(9464), 1099\u20131104. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)71146-6><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marmot, M., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2006). Social determinants of health<\/em> (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marmot, M., Allen, J., Boyce, T., Goldblatt, P., & Morrison, J. (2020). Health equity in England: The Marmot review 10 years on<\/em>. Institute of Health Equity. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.m693><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Masi, C. M., Chen, H.-Y., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15<\/em>(3), 219\u2013266. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1088868310377394><\/p>\n\n\n\n

McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. New England Journal of Medicine, 338<\/em>(3), 171\u2013179. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJM199801153380307><\/p>\n\n\n\n

McEwen, B. S. (2017). Neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. Trends in Neurosciences, 40<\/em>(4), 242\u2013255. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tins.2017.03.005><\/p>\n\n\n\n

McEwen, B. S., & Gianaros, P. J. (2010). Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: Links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186<\/em>(1), 190\u2013222. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1749-6632.2009.05331.x><\/p>\n\n\n\n

McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153<\/em>(18), 2093\u20132101. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.1993.00410180039004><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2020). Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: A conceptual and empirical meta-review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36<\/em>, 32\u201338. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2020.04.008><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83<\/em>(4), 435\u2013450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2183914<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nesse, R. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature, 1<\/em>(3), 261\u2013289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF02733986<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nesse, R. M. (2019). Good reasons for bad feelings: Insights from the frontier of evolutionary psychiatry<\/em>. Dutton.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3<\/em>(5), 400\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x<\/p>\n\n\n\n

O’Connor, E., Rossom, R. C., Henninger, M., Groom, H. C., & Burda, B. U. (2016). Screening for depression in adults: An updated systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 315<\/em>(4), 380\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2015.18381<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Fit mind, fit job: From evidence to practice in mental health and work<\/em>. OECD Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/9789264228283-en<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pedersen, J., Schultz, B. B., Madsen, I. E. H., Solovieva, S., Andersen, L. L., Rugulies, R., & B\u00fcltmann, U. (2019). Personality, mental disorders and the risk of disability pension in Denmark, 1995\u20132015: A nationwide, register-based cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 45<\/em>(5), 521\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5271\/sjweh.3836<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pfeiffer, P. N., Heisler, M., Piette, J. D., Rogers, M. A. M., & Valenstein, M. (2011). Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: A meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33<\/em>(1), 29\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.genhosppsych.2010.10.002<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pickles, A., Rowe, R., Simonoff, E., Foley, D., Rutter, M., & Silberg, J. (2010). Child psychiatric symptoms and psychosocial impairment: Relationship and prognostic significance. British Journal of Psychiatry, 197<\/em>(5), 395\u2013403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1192\/bjp.bp.109.075002<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17<\/em>(3), 715\u2013734. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0954579405050340<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131<\/em>(6), 925\u2013951. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.131.6.925<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of Being: Phenomenology, Psychiatry, and the Sense of Reality<\/em>. Oxford University Press. <https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/med\/9780199206469.001.0001><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rikard, S. M., Strahan, A. E., Schmit, K. M., & Guy, G. P., Jr. (2023). Chronic pain among adults\u2014United States, 2019\u20132021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72(15), 379\u2013385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7215a1<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roberts, J. A., Yaya, L. H. P., & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3<\/em>(4), 254\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/JBA.3.2014.015<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robinaugh, D. J., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Waldorp, L. J., Kossakowski, J. J., Fried, E. I., & Borsboom, D. (2020). Advancing the network theory of mental disorders: A computational model of panic disorder. Psychological Medicine, 50<\/em>(3), 419\u2013427. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0033291719000402<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Roseman, I. J. (2011). Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review, 3<\/em>(4), 434\u2013443. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1754073911410744<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78<\/em>(1), 122\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.78.1.122<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39<\/em>(6), 1161\u20131178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0077714<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110<\/em>(1), 145\u2013172. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.110.1.145<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124<\/em>(1), 39\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1196\/annals.1440.001<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotions are emergent processes: They require a dynamic computational architecture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364<\/em>(1535), 3459\u20133474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rstb.2009.0141<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Seeman, T. E., Singer, B. H., Rowe, J. W., Horwitz, R. I., & McEwen, B. S. (1997). Price of adaptation\u2013-Allostatic load and its health consequences: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Archives of Internal Medicine, 157<\/em>(19), 2259\u20132268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.1997.00440400111013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130<\/em>(4), 601\u2013630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.130.4.601<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Selye, H. (1976). The stress of life<\/em> (Rev. ed.). McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1956)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Servaes, P., Verhagen, S., & Bleijenberg, G. (2002). Fatigue in cancer patients during and after treatment: Prevalence, correlates and interventions. European Journal of Cancer, 38<\/em>(1), 27\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0959-8049(01)00332-X00332-X)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shekelle, P. G., Farmer, C. M., Newberry, S. J., Motala, A., Perry, T., Shanman, R., & Danz, M. (2024). Interventions to improve psychosocial well-being in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 39<\/em>(3), 602\u2013613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-023-08517-5<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., & McEwen, B. S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA, 301<\/em>(21), 2252\u20132259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2009.754<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Simmons, W. K., Avery, J. A., Barcalow, J. C., Bodurka, J., Drevets, W. C., & Bellgowan, P. (2013). Keeping the body in mind: Insula functional organization and functional connectivity integrate interoceptive, exteroceptive, and emotional awareness. Human Brain Mapping, 34<\/em>(11), 2944\u20132958. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hbm.22113<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Siu, A. L., & U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2016). Screening for depression in children and adolescents: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 164<\/em>(5), 360\u2013366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M15-2957<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spinoza, B. (1996). Ethics<\/em> (E. Curley, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1677)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & L\u00f6we, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166<\/em>(10), 1092\u20131097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.166.10.1092<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stellar, J. E., John-Henderson, N., Anderson, C. L., Gordon, A. M., McNeil, G. D., & Keltner, D. (2015). Positive affect and markers of inflammation: Discrete positive emotions predict lower levels of IL-6. Emotion, 15<\/em>(2), 129\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/emo0000033<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stringaris, A., & Goodman, R. (2009). Three decades of the study of irritability in children: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 48<\/em>(10), 971\u2013979. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CHI.0b013e3181b766aa<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taylor, S. E. (2006). Health psychology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2<\/em>, 1\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095729<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teicher, M. H., & Samson, J. A. (2016). Annual research review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57<\/em>(3), 241\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jcpp.12507<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Terlizzi, E. P., & Villarroel, M. A. (2020). Symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder among adults: United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief, 378, 1\u20138.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80<\/em>(1), 53\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.80.1.53<\/p>\n\n\n\n

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 315<\/em>(4), 380\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2015.18392<\/p>\n\n\n\n

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2016). Screening for depression in adults:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2023, June 20). Anxiety disorders in adults: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. https:\/\/www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org\/uspstf\/recommendation\/anxiety-adults-screening<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Velasco, P. F., & Loev, A. (2021). Affective inference theory: From emotions to consciousness. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 2<\/em>(1), 1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33735\/phimisci.2021.I.70<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ventura-Bort, C., Wendt, J., & Weymar, M. (2021). On the importance of the distinction between intensity and arousal in affective neuroscience. Frontiers in Psychology, 12<\/em>, 678321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.678321<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vidal-Ribas, P., Brotman, M. A., Valdivieso, I., Leibenluft, E., &Stringaris, A. (2016). The status of irritability in psychiatry: A conceptual and quantitative review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55<\/em>(7), 556\u2013570. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jaac.2016.04.014<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F. (1992). Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain, 50<\/em>(2), 133\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0304-3959(92)90154-490154-4)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wang, J., Mann, F., Lloyd-Evans, B., Ma, R., & Johnson, S. (2018). Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 18<\/em>, 156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12888-018-1736-5<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Williams, D. M., Rhodes, R. E., & Conner, M. T. (Eds.). (2018). Affective determinants of health behavior<\/em>. Elsevier Academic Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Williams, D. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Davis, B. A. (2019). Racism and health: Evidence and needed research. Annual Review of Public Health, 40<\/em>, 105\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-publhealth-040218-043750<\/p>\n\n\n\n

World Health Organization. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health<\/em>. World Health Organization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

World Health Organization. (2013). Mental health action plan 2013\u20132020<\/em>. World Health Organization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates<\/em>. World Health Organization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

World Health Organization. (2020). Mental health and work: Impact, issues and good practices<\/em>. World Health Organization. https:\/\/iris.who.int\/handle\/10665\/42346<\/p>\n\n\n\n

World Health Organization. (2022, March 2). COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide. WHO News. https:\/\/www.who.int\/news\/item\/02-03-2022-covid-19-pandemic-triggers-25-increase-in-prevalence-of-anxiety-and-depression-worldwide<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wrzus, C., & Luong, G. (2016). Social interactions across the lifespan: How age and social context shape emotions and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 30<\/em>(6), 582\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/per.2082<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yap, S. C. Y., Wortman, J., Anusic, I., Baker, S. G., Scherer, L. D., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2017). The effect of mood on judgments of subjective well-being: Nine tests of the judgment model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113<\/em>(6), 939\u2013961. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspp0000115<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., & Xu, W. (2024). E-mental health interventions for reducing stress and improving well-being in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15<\/em>, 11138032. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyt.2024.11138032<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zohar, D. (1999). When things go wrong: The effect of daily work hassles on effort, exertion, and negative mood. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72<\/em>(3), 265\u2013283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1348\/096317999166671<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zych, M., & Gogolla, N. (2021). The neurobiology of emotion: A new view. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 68<\/em>, 67\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.conb.2021.01.007<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cuijpers, P., Pineda, B. S., Ng, M. Y., Weisz, J. R., Mu\u00f1oz, R. F., Gentili, C., Quero, S., & Karyotaki, E. (2021). A meta-analytic review: Psychological treatment of subthreshold depression in children and adolescents. *Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 60*(9), 1072\u20131084. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jaac.2020.11.024<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jiang, X., Luo, Y., Chen, Y., Yan, J., Xia, Y., Yao, L., Wang, X., He, S., Wang, F., Wang, T., & Chen, Y. (2021). Comparative efficacy of multiple therapies for the treatment of patients with subthreshold depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. *Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15*, 755547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnbeh.2021.755547<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judd, L. L., Rapaport, M. H., Paulus, M. P., & Brown, J. L. (1994). Subsyndromal symptomatic depression: A new mood disorder? *Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55*(4 Suppl), 18\u201328.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Maser, J. D., Zeller, P. J., Endicott, J., Coryell, W., Paulus, M. P., Kunovac, J. L., Leon, A. C., Mueller, T. I., Rice, J. A., & Keller, M. B. (1998). A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders. *Archives of General Psychiatry, 55*(8), 694\u2013700. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archpsyc.55.8.694<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Brian K. Sullivan, PsyD Abstract Persistent negative feelings such as stress, loneliness, fatigue, pain, irritability, anxiety, malaise and depression are more than temporary discomforts. When they endure, even at subclinical levels, they predict disease, disability, and premature mortality as strongly as many traditional medical and social risks. Yet decades of evidence have not yet been… <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7702,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[86],"tags":[91],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7694"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7694"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7694\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7704,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7694\/revisions\/7704"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7702"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/everypiecematters.com\/jget\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}